Chữa bài IELTS Task 2

[7/6/2018, 11:22:16 PM] Cám ơn các bạn!

————————-

Wild animals have no place in the 21[st] century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
Some people argue that the place for wild animals would disappear in the 21[st] century, so we should not take the protection of animals into consideration. I completely disagree with this point of view for the following justificaitons.
To begin with, it is unbelievable to argue that wild animals have no place to live. Firstly, our planet is giant, which include a multitude of elements, and also there are unfamiliar places that people have neve been exploring in this century. To be more specific, it is wrong to say that the living of these animals would lost unless we have a plan to damage the ecosystem around the world. Secondly, it is natural that wild animals and people should exist together; therefore, we should not let them die out. Finally, if wild animals disappear in our lives, we have not capability of having an opportunity to see them.
I also disagree with this statement that protecting animals is a waste of resources. Because of the biological diversity in our lives, we have a plan to protect these animals. Besides, the functions of some animals is beneficial for a number of research in academic institutions, especially in some medical and archaeological. In addition, some organizations are established to protect wild animals, and they will pay salaries for those who work in conservation. As a result, they do their job as some types of normal work s in the world.
In conclusion, I do not believe that wild animals would not exist, and I also believe that we should protect them as possible.