[Đào Thị Minh Ngọc]

Task 1: Smoking should be banned in public places. Do you agree or disagree?
Answer:
In recent decades, heated debates have centered on the smoking in public places. Some people suggest imposing a restriction on smoking in places where people often have social activities. I totally agree with this view for the following reason.
The first reason which drives governments to ban smoking related fire risk. Smoking can increase the risks of fire in places with highly flammable materials. For example, lots of forest fires have been caused because a smoker has thrown a cigarette lit up in the forest. Therefore, thousands of trees and animals have died. Simultaneously, many buildings have also caught fire due to these kinds of ignorance of a part of the smokers, which deprives them of valuable assets.
The second reason is that it is harmful for passive smokers. It runs a high risk of serious health problems for non-smokers. Apart from heart diseases, other health hazards that are becoming increasingly are cancer and cirrhosis. Also, many people these days suffer from asthma and as reported by a research, most of them are non-smokers.
The last reason is that smoking pollutes the environment. Smoking one cigarette results in the releases a huge quantity of CO2 and carcinogens and other toxins into the atmosphere that pollutes the air seriously. This pollution could harm human and animal life. But the damage to the environment does not stop there. Discarded cigarette butts are frequently littered on public streets and entryways, which worsens the beauty of landscape.
In conclusion, it is clear that government should ban smoke in public places. This could have positive impacts on both community health and development of society.

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[trucquynhnm]

Feedback của bạn. Keep up the hard work!

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.