[lehoangkhanhngan]

Some people think it is more important to plant more tree in open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
Opinions differ over the necessity of planting more tree in open areas in metropolises. In my opinion, I totally agree with the idea of growing more tree than providing more housing though few mortals dissent with it.
On the one hand, it is justifiable why some people hold an opinion that building more housing is more crucial in towns and cities. Firstly, overpopulation is one of the most controversial issues in the urban area owing to the migration of citizens to the cities or the failure of family planning. Therefore, in order to address this detrimental trend, accommodations need to be increased in quantity. Moreover, lack of affordable housing could lead to the increase in crime rates since if people become homeless, they would take advantage of alcohol or drug to relieve stresses. Hence, it’s quite convincing to provide more housing.
On the other hand, I would argue that planting more tree in towns and cities is much more important than others. Initially, as a result of modernizing, several factories, which lead to severe, have been built in metropolises. Thus, more tree should be grown to ensure the health of residents and have the clean environment as tree gives us oxygen. Furthermore, heat in the cities could be better controlled by having more trees which filter the sun’s heat and offer shade. This ultimately lowers the temperate and reduces effects of global warming. Consequently, not only Not only are we but the next generation able to live in a better world.
In conclusion, I argue that we should plant more tree in cities and towns in spites the sake of providing more housing.

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[NKD]

Here’s your corrected essay

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.