[Ngọc Diệp]

Some people believe that tourists should accept social and environmental responsibility while others believe that tourists should not accept any responsibility at all. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is sometimes argued that visitors have to responsibility for society and environment. While I agree with the idea of law which could point out these responsibilities. In my way of thinking, I completely believe in visitors’ affecting on society and environment where they come to.
First of all, there are lots of kind of people who come to visit or sightseeing, as a result, when the president launch responsibilities’ visitors into public it would be remind them to protect where they come to. For example, without any responsible disclosure, some people would not be clear about the cultures and principles of this area, hence they would be intentional to do some negative affect on. In additionally, visitors can come to any country by long-term or short-term visa. That clearly reveals that the importance of this kind of policies can shows exactly their responsibilities on country.
On the other hand, there are different types of visitors which president should manage to keep the common arrangement of the country or area. Nowadays, the world political situation has something fluctuating, terrorisms could hide in visitors and attach people for instance. As a result, visit management is really necessary with the policy of social and environmental responsibility. However, it could be rewarded to foreign visitors whether they contributed to the country as well to encourage developed contribution.
To sum up, this is necessary and significance to clearly point out how visitors have responsibilities for society and environment of the country or the area.

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

[Huong Trang]

Please find the revised version attached and feel free to comment if you have any query.

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.